Police raided DAP HQ

Police raided the DAP national headquarters for the first time ever this evening, carting away a computer and 19 digital video discs (DVDs).

The search and seizure, made without a warrant, was in relation to leaflets found when arrests were made during a candle-light vigil two nights ago in Pandan Indah, Kuala Lumpur, calling for fresh polls in Perak.

It is the latest in a series of crackdowns on Pakatan Rakyat (PR) attempts to gain public support on the Perak crisis which includes repeated arrests and banning of videos of the chaotic May 7 Perak assembly sitting where Speaker V. Sivakumar was dumped.

"First time in the 42-year history of DAP, police raiding our HQ," DAP veteran leader Lim Kit Siang posted in his Twitter account.

Three unmarked cars arrived at the headquarters and 11 plainclothes officers entered the building on the quiet Jalan 20/9 residential area in Petaling Jaya at 6.25pm.

They had brought Ooi Leng Hang, a party worker and one of the detainees from that night, who gave them the password to unlock the digital lock on the front door.

The handcuffed Ooi, who is DAP Socialist Youth political education chief, then led the police to his workstation, where police began to detail the items on his desk to be taken away.

They include his computer, monitor, keyboard, mouse, earphones, external hard drives and DVDs including those related to the May 7 assembly and one labelled "Photos of Port Dickson Camp."

Treasurer Fong Kui Lun and vice-chairman Tan Kok Wai were the first DAP lawmakers to arrive at about 6.50pm followed by lawyers Gobind Singh Deo and Lim Lip Eng.

Extraordinary Judges...

I was in Ipoh Court this morning. One of the Judge when seeing me in the Chambers, had commented that “Cecil’s (Zambry’s lawyer) submission yesterday was weak.”

Even if that is the case, would the Judge (who had passed such a comment) will decide in favour of Nizar?

I then asked myself another question: “Does Zambry really needs a good submission for the Court? Or you need just some ‘good’ judges”

Sulaiman Abdullah had rightfully said: “We have extraordinary judges with extraordinary ability”

This weekend...

14.05.2009 8.oopm: Forum on "Perak Crisis, One Black Malaysia" at Penang
---
15.05.2009 7.30pm: DAP HQ DAPSY NEC Meeting
---
16-17.05.2009 8.30am to 5.00pm: DAP National 2-days-Retreat at Palace of the Golden Horses

Situation stalled... why cracking your head?

Problem 1:
Nizar had been pronounced as the rightful MB in Perak, so he should be allowed to carry on his duty as a MB.

Zambry obtained an order for stay of execution of KL High Court’s decision, so Nizar can no longer carry on his duty as MB.

KL High Court’s decision remains good and intact, until being overturned by the Court of Appeal. The stay of execution does not in any way overturn the decision. So, Zambry is NOT the legitimate MB.

If Zambry is not the legitimate MB, he cannot enter MB office.

If there is a stay of execution, Nizar cannot enter MB office.

From 2 MBs in Perak, the People of Perak now have NO Menteri Besar.

Situation stalled.

Problem 2:
KL High Court pronounced Nizar as the rightful MB. Only a motion of no-confidence in the Dewan can remove him.

Zambry can only legitimatize himself by moving a motion of no-confidence against Nizar in the Dewan.

If Zambry moves a motion of no-confidence in the Dewan, it means Zambry is recognizing Nizar as the MB.

If Zambry moves a motion of no-confidence in the Dewan, it means Zambry admits he is not the MB.

If Zambry is not the MB, he should not occupy the MB office now.

As such, Zambry cannot move a motion of no-confidence against Nizar.

As such, Nizar cannot be removed.

Situation stalled.

Why cracking your head?
Why cracking your head? Dissolve the Assembly and return the mandate to the People.

In a democracy country, it is the People’s choice, not BN PR or the Court’s choice.

FRU and Water Cannons deployed, again....

About 8 FRU trucks of different sizes including the water cannon ones are deploying at the back of SUK. Is there such a need?

Return the mandate to the People...

My phones are flooded with calls. Both phones also out of battery.

It is not difficult to understand the happiness of the People, after a long awaited moment since 205. Without the support from the People, we will not be able to stand until today. The People of Perak are great!

As we always stress, we are not seeking for the Court to declare we are the rightful Government. We are only seeking for the Court to interpret the correct position of law. Finally the High Court of Kuala Lumpur had restored some losing confidence for the Judiciary. It is undisputable a brave Judgment.

Now, even though legitimately we can go back to the MB and EXCOs’ office, but we will stick to our promise. We are going to return the mandate back to the People. Let the People of Perak decide which Government they want, whether a BN or a PR one.

KL High Court: Nizar still the rightful MB

The KL High Court had on today pronounced that Nizar is still the legitimate MB for Perak. Let's go for a fresh election in Perak!!! Return the mandate back to the People!!!

Experience on 07.05.2009 to share: Part 2 Abdullah Antong

Abdullah Antong, the sacked-Dewan Secretary. His name appeared more than the Dato’ SS in thie Perak’s crisis when comes to the issue of Dewan sitting. He was the one purportedly issued a statement on 02.03.2009, a day before the Tree’s Assembly, saying that the Assembly is illegal. I believed there are someone behind the statement issued.

We do not blame him. He is a Government Servant, under the strict instructions from the BN-biased Dato’ SS. He is doing everything, rightfully or wrongfully, under the pressure of Dato’ SS.

On 07.5.2009, he tried to start off the Assembly with the usual Prayer (Doa), in defiance of the Speaker’s directions that the Assembly shall not start if the suspended 7 and resigned 3 had not left the Assembly hall.

As the Bentara refused to listen to the Speaker’s instructions, we the PR reps have no choice but to proceed towards Abdullah Antong and stop him. BN’s reps were trying to get him to their seats (which the microphone well functioning) to start off the sitting. We tried our best to stop him.

As I was following Abdullah Antong every second and every movement, I can notice that the State Secretary was using very hard pressure on him. The words used against Abdullah by Dato’ SS, though cannot be classified as bad and vulgar, were far more than the words necessary to be employed by a normal Boss in giving instructions to an Employee. Dato’ SS did not treat him as his staff, not at all.

In some BN-friendly’s decisions made by Abdullah Antong during this Crisis, he was always made a scape goat. There was always a man behind him, who is a coward and dare not come forward to declare his stance.

Pepper Spray, key chain or pendrive?

Our ADUN Aulong, Yew Tian Hoe had complaint that he was being sprayed pepper yesterday by someone during the tussle at the Assembly yesterday.

The whole action was caught on video which was later reported by 8TV. The culprit is the defected Hee Yit Foong.

It was reported by Malaysiakini that she denied it was a pepper spray. She said “it might be a key chain or a pendrive”.

At the first place, can’t she properly identify and suppose to know what was she holding at that time?

Let’s look at the photo to see if you have a similar “key chain” or “pendrive” as claimed by HYF.

Experience on 07.05.2009 to share: Part 1 Dato' SS...

Thanks for all your comments despite the change of blog’s address which had caused certain inconvenience to some of you. My apology.

Indeed I have a lot of things to share with all of you here. I will make it as short, precise and simple as possible. Reading long article will make us bored. Let me go one by one

The Dato’ State Secretary
He is the man behind all the Civil Servant’s action yesterday. He can be seen to have instructed the sacked-Dewan Secretary Abdullah Antong all the time, giving him some hard words in pushing him to start the Prayer despite of the Speaker’s direction that the sitting will not start until Zambry and the rest leave the hall as instructed.

He was seen moving around giving instructions ever since the Speaker was speaking. There is no de corum at all. No respect from him to the Speaker.

A lot of People may ask how powerful the State Secretary is. The answer is, to put it simple, he is the No. 1 man in the SUK Building. All staffs and admin are under him.

As such, it is hard to see if there are any staff of SUK dares to go against him, although we know that a lot of them have preferred us than BN.

Yet, maybe he has forgotten that, the floor at the Sitting Dewan is and should be under the Speaker’s directive and not any other.

He may have also forgotten, it is the Rakyat who pays his salary and not Barisan Nasional.

Just to add here. He is the one who had issued notice to the PR State EXCOs to leave their rooms (without the new Government, legal or illegal, being formed) immediately after Tuanku’s announcement of refusal to the dissolution of the sitting.

He is the one who had issued a “close-door” order to the Public on 02.03.2009 in order to prevent our 03.03.2009 sitting.

He is the one who had given instruction to the OCPD for getting the Police and FRUs to block us from entering the SUK on 03.03.2009.

If anyone has anything to share with him, he can be reached at 019-5568885.
---

To share more with you all later.

Ganesan left the Hall...

Ganesan had purportedly announced that the sitting to be adjourned for another hour and left the Hall. The Speaker V Sivakumar is still sitting at the Speaker's seat, maintaining his stance that he will not start the sitiing until Zambry & 6 together with defected and resigned Hee, Osman dan Jamaluddin adhere to his order to leave the Assembly Hall.

Assembly stalled...

The State Assembly is now stalled. All parties seated at their own place. Again, it has proven that the Assembly can no longer function.

Sitting at the lobby outside Dewan...

The PR elected reps are being refrained from entering the Assembly hall. We are made to wait outside at the lobby. The Assembly Hall's are all locked. The personnel said have to wait for Tuanku to come.

---

The most ridiculous incident jst now was, when we came out from the lift, a police officer straight away addressed us "YB!". The next thing they asked "Whether you have a Pass? If not, you are not allowed to be in." I replied them: "You can recognise us as the elected reps, why are you not allowing us to do so?"

---

The personnel informed us that the directions came from Dato' SS. Hey, don't hide behind the on-duty officers. Come out and explain you action to the People.

8 hours to the sitting...

Road blocks were set up. Dato' SS was seen together with the Police, checking each and every one of the car trying to go to SUK direction fom DR Park roundabout. They were seen allowing a Mercedez ML 240 to get in and rejected the rest.

12 hours before sitting...

It is now 12 hours away before the next sitting. I was always excited when the sitting comes. Eagerly and desperately waiting for the chance to speak in the Dewan. A chance to speak for the People of Canning which I have promised everyone during election.

Yet, at this round, it is not so.

Not that I no longer want to speak for the People. Not that I am not prepared. It is because the current situation in this lovely state of Perak.

We do not know what will happen tomorrow morning. The Police started to block all the roads along SUK. The Court given an injunction for gathering near SUK. The IGP said that People cannot wear black tomorrow.

What is happening?

Why not just return the mandate to the People?

Zambry dan 6 lain tidak berhak untuk menghadiri DUN

Keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan pada 16 April 2009 tidak membenarkan Dato’ Seri Zambry bin Abdul Kadir & 6 ADUN yang lain memasuki Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak pada 7 Mei 2009

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Banyak kekeliruan telah timbul akibat daripada keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan pada 16/4/2009 ,samada Dato’ Seri Zambry bin Abdul Kadir dan 6 ADUN yang lain berhak untuk masuk ke Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak pada 7 Mei 2009.

Penjelasan berikut jelas menunjukkan bahawa Dato’ Seri Zambry bin Abdul Kadir dan 6 ADUN yang lain tidak berhak untuk memasuki Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak pada 7 Mei 2009

Pada 18/2/2009 Jawatankuasa hak dan kebebasan Dewan Negeri telah membuat keputusan untuk mengantungkan ADUN Pangkor, Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir ( gelaran seperti pada masa itu ) daripada menghadiri sidang Dewan Negeri selama 18 bulan dan Encik Zainol Fadzi Bin Haji Paharuddin (ADUN Sungai Manik), Dato’ Ramly Zahari (ADUN Manong), Puan Hamidah Binti Osman (ADUN Sungai Rapat), Encik Saarani Bin Mohamad (ADUN Rungkup), Encik Mohd Zahir Abdul Bin Khalid (ADUN Kamunting) dan Dr Mah Hang Soon (ADUN Chenderiang) digantung daripada hadir sidang Dewan Negeri selama 12 bulan.

Keputusan Jawatankuasa Hak dan Kebebasan Dewan Negeri tersebut telah diterima dan diluluskan oleh Dewan Undangan Negeri yang telah bersidang pada 3/3/2009.

Pihak Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir dan 6 ADUN yang tersebut di atas telah memohon kepada mahkamah untuk satu pengisytiharan berkenaan dengan penggantungan mereka daripada menghadiri Dewan Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan . Mereka telah mengambil tindakan mahkamah tersebut terhadap Speaker DUN dan Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan dan kes tersebut telah dirujuk kepada Mahkamah Persekutuan untuk perbicaraan. Walau bagaimanapun, pada 2/4/2009 mereka telah memohon menarik balik tindakan mahkamah tersebut terhadap Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan dan tindakan terhadap Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan telah dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Persekutuan pada hari tersebut.

Pada 16/4/2009, Mahkamah Persekutuan hanya membenarkan 2 daripada 10 perintah-perintah yang dipohon oleh mereka dan sekarang sudah timbul persoalan samada Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir dan 6 ADUN yang tersebut di atas boleh menghadiri Mesyuarat sidang Dewan Negeri yang akan diadakan pada 7/5/2009.

Mahkamah Persekutuan telah membenarkan dua perisytiharan seperti berikut:-

1. Bahawa keputusan Speaker DUN menggantung Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir daripada menghadiri Dewan Undangan Negeri selama 18 bulan adalah tidak sah dan terbatal.

2. Bahawa keputusan Speaker DUN menggantung 6 ADUN yang tersebut di atas daripada menghadiri Dewan Undangan Negeri selama 12 bulan adalah tidak sah dan terbatal.

Keputusan di atas adalah tersilap kerana bukan Speaker DUN yang telah membuat keputusan penggantungan tersebut tetapi Jawatankuasa Hak dan Kebebasan Dewan Undangan Negeri dan Dewan Undangan Negeri yang telah memutuskan tentang penggantungan tersebut.

Oleh yang demikian, keputusan Jawatankuasa Hak dan Kebebasan dan Dewan Undangan Negeri masih sah dan berkuatkuasa dan Speaker DUN sebagai pengerusi dan ahli dalam Jawatankuasa tersebut dan Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan adalah terikat dengan keputusan yang telah diputuskan oleh kedua-dua badan tersebut.
Sebenarnya kes tersebut tidak harus dibawa terhadap Speaker DUN kerana perlindungan yang diberikan kepada Speaker DUN di bawah Seksyen 3 Legislative Assembly (Privileges) Enactment 1959 yang berbunyi seperti berikut:-

“No member shall be liable to any civil or criminal proceedings, arrest, imprisonment, or damages by reason of any matter or thing which he may have brought by petition, bill, resolution, motion or otherwise, or have said before the Assembly or any committee”.

Tambahan pula, keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan merupakan satu pengistiharan sahaja dan bukannya satu certiorari atau mandamus. Ia tidak mengikat Jawatankuasa Hak dan Kebebasan Dewan Undangan Negeri dan Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan.

Perkara 72 Perlembagaan Persekutuan memperuntukkan tentang keistimewaan Dewan Negeri dan Perkara 72(1) memperuntukkan seperti berikut:-


Keistimewaan Dewan Negeri

“Sahnya apa-apa perjalanan dalam mana-mana Dewan Negeri tidak boleh dipersoal dalam mana-mana mahkamah”.

Tindakan Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir dan 6 ADUN tersebut terhadap Speaker DUN juga adalah bertentangan dengan Perkara 72(2) Perlembagaan Persekutuan yang berbunyi seperti berikut:-

“Tiada seseorang pun boleh dikena dakwa dalam apa-apa jua pembicaraan dalam mana-mana mahkamah mengenai apa-apa jua yang dikatakan atau apa-apa undi yang diberi olehnya apabila mengambil bahagian dalam perjalanan mana-mana Dewan Negeri atau mana-mana jawatankuasanya”.

Apa yang memperkukuhkan kesimpulan bahawa Dato’ Zambry bin Abdul Kadir dan 6 ADUN yang lain tidak berhak menghadiri Dewan Undangan Negeri Perak pada 7 Mei 2009 ialah kerana Mahkamah Persekutuan telah MENOLAK permohonan Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir dan 6 ADUN tersebut untuk perintah-perintah berikut:-

1. suatu perisytiharan bahawa Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir dan 6 ADUN tersebut adalah berhak menghadiri dan mengambil bahagian dalam semua sidang Dewan Negeri dan menjalankan segala fungsi dan kewajipan mereka dalamnya;

2. suatu perisytiharan bahawa keputusan Speaker DUN menggantung dan melarang Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir menghadir pada sidang Dewan Negeri selama 18 bulan, adalah ultra vires Undang-Undang Tubuh Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan, Perintah-Perintah Tetap Dewan Perhimpunan Undangan Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan dan Enakmen Dewan Perhimpunan Undangan (Keistimewaan) 1959 dan/atau semua undang-undang yang berkaitan dan oleh itu adalah terbatal dan tak sah;

3. suatu perisytiharan bahawa perbuatan Speaker DUN menggantung dan melarang Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir menghadiri sidang Dewan Negeri Perak selama 18 bulan adalah menyalahi undang-undang.

4. suatu perisytiharan bahawa keputusan patik Speaker DUN menggantung dan melarang kenam-enam ADUN di atas menghadiri sidang Dewan Negeri selama 12 bulan adalah ultra vires Undang-Undang Tubuh Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan, Perintah-Perintah tetap Dewan Perhimpunan Undangan Negeri Perak Darul Ridzuan dan Enakmen Dewan Perhimpunan Undangan (Keistimewaan) 1959 dan/atau semua undang-undang yang berkaitan dan oleh itu adalah terbatal dan tak sah;

5. suatu perisytiharan bahawa perbuatan Speaker DUN menggantung dan melarang keenam-enam ADUN yang tersebut di atas menghadiri sidang Dewan Undangan Negeri selama 12 bulan adalah menyalahi undang-undang;

6. suatu perisytiharan bahawa Dewan Undangan Negeri adalah tidak terikat dengan keputusan Speaker DUN menggantung dan melarang Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir dan 6 ADUN tersebut menghadiri sidang Dewan Undangan Negeri;

7. suatu perisytiharan bahawa Dewan Undangan Negeri adalah tidak terikat dengan apa-apa arahan, perintah dan/atau petunjuk Speaker DUN yang berbangkit daripada atau berhubung dengan keputusan patik yang bertarikh 17hb Februari 2009.

8. bahawa Persidangan Dewan Undangan Negeri pada 3/3/2009 adalah tidak mengikut undang-undang (unlawful).

Keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan telah ditafsirkan oleh peguam-peguam Pakatan Rakyat sebagai Dato’ Zambry Bin Abd. Kadir dan 6 ADUN lain tersebut tidak berhak untuk menghadiri Dewan Undangan Negeri dan keputusan Dewan Undangan Negeri pada 3/3/2009 dianggap sah.

Bertarikh 5 hb Mei 2009


Dato Ngeh Koo Ham
Exco Kanan Kerajaan Pakatan Rakyat
Negeri Perak
Penyelaras Pasukan Peguam-Peguam

赞比里以及6名州议员不可以进入州议会

霹雳州民联政府高级行政议员兼民联律师团总协调拿督倪可汉于2009年5月5日（星期二）在怡保所发表的声明：

联邦法院在2009年4月16日的判决，并没有允许拿督斯里赞比里以及6名行政议员出席2009年5月7日的霹雳州议会。

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
联邦法院2009年4月16日的判决引起了许多混淆，包括拿督斯里赞比里以及其他6位州议员是否可以出席在2009年5月7日的州议会。

以下的解释明确的显示拿督斯里赞比里以及6名州议员没有权利出席2009年5月7日的州议会。

在2009年2月18日，霹雳州议会特权委员会议决禁止邦咯州议员拿督赞比里进入州议会18个月，以及其他6名州议员、也就是再努法兹（双溪马力）、拿督蓝里（万农）、哈米达（双溪喇叭）、沙兰尼（龙谷）、莫哈末查希（甘文丁）以及马汉顺（积莪营）禁止进入州议会12个月。

特权委员会的决定已经在2009年3月3日的州议会中获得接纳以及通过。

拿督斯里赞比里以及上述6名州议员较后入禀法庭，要求法庭针对禁足令作出宣布。他们分别对州议长以及霹雳州议会采取该项法律行动，并在较后将案件转交给联邦法院。无论如何，在4月2日，他们作出申请要求收回针对霹雳州议会的法庭诉讼，联邦法院也在当天撤销针对州议会的诉讼。

在4月16日，联邦法院在赞比里等人的十项申请中，只批准了其中两项。现在就浮现了赞比里以及6名州议员是否可以出席5月7日州议会的问题。

联邦法院批准并作出了以下的宣布：

1. 州议会议长禁止赞比里进入州议会长达18个月的决定是不合法以及撤销；

2. 州议会议长禁止6名行政议员进入州议会长达12个月的决定是不合法以及撤销。

上述的判决是错误的，因为作出禁足决定的并不是州议会议长，而是州议会特权委员会以及霹雳州州议会。

有鉴于此，特权委员会以及州议会的决定是有效的；而州议会议长作为特权委员会以及州议会的主席以及成员是受到这两个机构所作出的议决约束。

其实，在1959年立法议会（特权）法令第3条文的保障下，州议长并不应该被采取相关的法律行动：-

“没有任何成员可以因他在议会中或者任何委员会的任何行动，而面对民事或刑事、逮捕、监禁、赔偿行动。”

同时，联邦法院的判决只是一项“宣布”，而不是一项“指令”。它对于特权委员会以及霹雳州议会并没有约束力。

联邦宪法第72条文闸明州议会的特权。第72（1）条文说道：

州议会特权

“州议会任何流程的合法性并不可以在任何的法庭下被质疑。”

赞比里以及6名行政议员针对州议长所采取的法律行动也违反了联邦宪法第72（2）条文：

“没有一个成员可以因为在州议会或委员会的流程中所说的或者是所投下的票，而面对任何的提控或法庭审讯。”

同时，联邦法院已经驳回拿督斯里赞比里等人的以下要求，更进一步地巩固赞比里等人没有权力进入5月7日州议会的论点：-

1. 一项宣布表示拿督赞比里以及6名州议员有权力出席以及参与州议会卡会，并进行他们在州议会里面的角色以及责任；

2. 一项宣布表示州议会议长禁止拿督赞比里出席州议会长达18个月，是违反霹雳州宪法、议会常以及立法议会（特权）法令或其他相关法律，所以是不合法以及被撤销；

3. 一项宣布表示州议会议长禁止拿督赞比里出席州议会开会18个月的做法是违反法律的；

4. 一项宣布表示州议会议长禁止上述6名州议员出席州议会长达12个月，是违反霹雳州宪法、议会常以及立法议会（特权）法令或其他相关法律，所以是不合法以及被撤销；

5. 一项宣布表示州议会议长禁止6名州议员出席州议会开会12个月的做法是违反法律的；

6. 一项宣布表示州议会并没有受到州议会议长禁止拿督赞比里以及6名州议员进入州议会开会的决定所约束；

7. 一项宣布表示州议会并没有受到州议会议长在2009年2月17日所作出或有关的任何指示、谕令所约束；

8. 2009年3月3日的州议会是不合法的。

有鉴于此，联邦法院的判决已经由民联的律师团诠译为拿督斯里赞比里以及6名州议员不可以进入州议会，而3月3日州议会的决定是合法并有效的。

拿督倪可汉
2009年5月5日

Pre-07.05.2009: Police's harrassment...

The Police went to YB Thomas Su (Pasir Pinji), YB Drs Idham Lim (Titi Serong) and YB Sivasubramaniam (Buntong) house today. They were seen in uniform and taking photos from outside the house.

What are their purposes in doing so? To cause certain inconvenience and harrassment to us or to make us distracted before 07.05.2009? Don’t they have some other better things to do?

PA ADUN Kuala Kurau Diserang

GEMPAR ! Terkini jam 10.00 PM : PA ADUN Kuala Kurau diserang orang tidak dikenali dengan corta dan parang

KUALA KURAU : Pegawai Khas (PA) ADUN (PKR) Kuala Kurau, Sdr. Adnan (gambar) telah diserang oleh sekumpulan lelaki berkenderaan 3 buah kereta dengan senjata cotra dan parang di kedai makan di hadapan Pejabat ADUN di sini malam ini.Pada jam 9.38 tadi saya menerima berita dari satu SMS yang dikirim oleh seorang ahli PAS Tanjung Piandang yang berada ditempat kejadian. Pengesahan juga saya perolihi dari ADUN Kuala Kurau, Abdul Yunus Jamhari sebentar tadi.Dari maklumat awal yang diperolihi pihak kami masih tidak dapat mengenal pasti motif serangan tersebut.Selain itu maklumat yang disampaikan sebentar tadi memaklumkan mangsa dapat diselamatkan dan diletakkan ditempat yang dirahsiakan . Kecederaan masih belum dikenal pasti setakat ini.